Here's Why You Shouldn't Panic When An Airliner Loses An Engine In Flight

By  Benjamin Zhang
Aug. 12, 2014, 4:37 PM

 

Boeing 787.

Over the weekend, a Thomson Airways Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner suffered a failure in one of its massive GE turbofan engines over the Atlantic. The airliner,traveling from the Dominican Republic to Manchester, England, was an hour and a half into the nine-hour flight. The jet, full of vacationers returning to the U.K., safely diverted on its remaining engine to a remote airport in the Azores Islands.

Instances of an airliner losing an engine are obviously not unheard of. It can and does happen. Most of the time, the pilot diverts and no one is injured.

However, there have been occasions in which pilots chose to fly on to their destination instead of turning around.

In 2005, British Airways Flight 268, routed to London, lost one of its four engines while taking off from Los Angeles International Airport. Instead of returning to LAX, the pilot and his Boeing 747-400 continued on toward Heathrow Airport. But because of unfavorable winds and operating conditions that caused the plane to burn too much fuel, the jumbo jet didn't have the gas to reach London and made an emergency landing in Manchester.

Airbus A340-300.

Long-distance and transoceanic flights have traditionally been flown by three- or four-engine wide body airliners. This is because when it comes to the engine count on an airliner, aviation thinking dictates that there is safety in numbers. 

But as modern turbofan engines have become more reliable, engine failures have become far less common. As a result, most airlines have turned to twin-engined mini-jumbos that are more fuel efficient.

These days, the three-engine airliner has gone the way of the dinosaur, and the four-engine jumbo jets that once dominated the skies are well on their way toward extinction. 

However, engine failures do still happen. As terrifying as they may be for many of the passengers on board, though, losing one engine on a twin-engined airliner like the Thomson Airways 787 isn't as serious as one might think.

When an aircraft is flying without one of its engines, it tends to fly at a lower altitude and work the remaining engine(s) harder. This makes the plane less fuel efficient and reduces range. However, the vast majority of twin-engine long-haul airliners can perform this maneuver with no significant reduction in capabilities.

Before a twin-engine airliner is allowed fly long distance routes over large bodies of water or through uninhabited regions like the Arctic, it must be certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for ETOPS or Extended range Twin Operations.

Boeing

Boeing 777-3J6ER.

When an aircraft is certified, part of the assessment is based on the plane's performance when flying on a single engine.

For example, the Boeing Dreamliner — like the one flown by Thomson Airways — is certified for ETOPS-330. This means that the aircraft can fly routes that take it as far as 330 minutes (five and a half hours) of single-engine flying time from the nearest viable airport.

Other twin-engine airliners, like the Boeing 777, are also certified for ETOPS 330. Airbus' popular A330 has been certified for 180 minutes of ETOPS flying, while the company's coming A350 is currently seeking 420 minutes of ETOPS certification.

 

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/shouldnt-panic-airliner-loses-engine-2014-8#ixzz3AhYTdeHO